Analysis Of Shakespeare 's ' King Lear ' And ' Othello ' Essay

1516 Words Nov 7th, 2015 7 Pages
In Poetics, Aristotle defines the genre of tragedy, which has long been respected as the only efficient and effective model for attaining true tragic effect. Despite this tradition, Shakespeare’s plays deviate from this framework, but are still revered as respected Renaissance tragedies. By Aristotelian definitions, neither King Lear nor Othello are ideal tragedies, but nonetheless they both adeptly accomplish the aim of tragedy. Both plays still arouse feelings of pity and fear, despite varying in form from Aristotle’s ideal tragedies and even each other. King Lear is more experimental in its approach, while Othello follows Aristotle’s principles of unity more closely. Shakespeare’s varied approach to tragedy allows for the exploration of new ideas and alters the impact and message of each respective play. King Lear and Othello are still equally effective in achieving tragic effects and expressing complex themes as an ideal tragedy. Instead of Aristotle’s model providing an absolute model for tragedy, its manipulation allows for the expression of different aspects of humanity and its flaws. Effectively, deviating from the tragic norms allows Shakespeare to achieve varied effects and experiences in Othello and King Lear, overall enhancing the magnitude and impact in both cases.
PARAGRAPH ON PITY AND FEAR AND CATHARSIS AND REPRESENTATION AND CHARACTER AND EVENTS ETC.
Unity of time is a fundamental element of tragedy extracted from Aristotle’s Poetics. While Aristotle only…

Related Documents

Udemy - PHP Programming For Everyone | Battle Athletess Daiundoukai (TV) | 森林奇缘 The Stolen Princess 2018 1080p WEB-DL X264 AAC CHS-MiniBT