Should Cloning Be Legal? Essay

1760 Words Nov 5th, 2015 null Page
“Banning human cloning sends the regrettable message that politics and public pressure triumph over logic and the law” (Foley). Cloning has been a debatable topic in politics for over a decade. Supreme Courts, politicians, and legislators discuss the ethics of cloning and have mostly come to a conclusion that it is unethical. Since experimentation on the embryos is claimed to be murdering a fetus, cloning has not been allowed the potential it can fulfill. This shows that politics and public pressure have more authority and influence over what can be achieved and the freedom of America. The process of cloning should be legal because it could produce higher quality animals, produce healthier offspring, give infertile couples a chance at being biological parents, and cure diseases.
Legalizing cloning could be used to clone animals to better the quality of food and animals. Farmers throughout the years have experienced difficulties with their livestock. Some animals are too small, do not produce enough resources, or are different from the other animals (Wilmut, Tudge, and Campbell). They desire consistency with their animals. Ian Wilmut, Colin Tudge, and Keith Campbell, authors of “Animal Cloning Could Be Beneficial”, share that “[a] wild cow produces around 300 gallons of milk in a year…, while many modern Friesians produce 2,000 gallons and more of milk a year”. Farmers could clone the “elite”, high production animals to ensure that their business thrives from multiples of…

Related Documents

Glory Sound Prep | Spitfire 720p | 1080p Legendado – Torrent Download (2018) | 11 16 2017-03-29Duck Dynasty - End of an Era, Part 2